Skip to content
Some companies pay us when you click through to them. Scores come from published facts. Some companies pay us when you click through. Disclosure
BestBots

n8n vs Make: Pricing, AI Agents and Which to Pick

The two favorite Zapier alternatives, compared on published prices, AI agent features, integrations and who should build with each.

By , research by the BestBots team · Updated Oct 18, 2026

Fact checked against each company's published pricing, documentation and verified user ratings. How we score

BestBots is reader supported. When you click through to a company we may earn a commission, and partnerships can affect which companies appear and where. Scores come from the published facts on each page. Disclosure

Make is the better pick for business users who want a visual builder, 3,500+ ready made apps and AI Agents on every plan from $16 a month. n8n is the better pick for technical teams: it bills per full workflow run with unlimited steps, supports JavaScript and Python, and is free to self host, which makes it cheaper for long, high volume workflows.

n8n logon8n4.3

Open source workflow automation with AI agent nodes, free to self host and billed per workflow execution in the cloud, built for technical teams.

From €24 per month billed monthly (about $27) (per workflow execution)

Visit n8n
vs
Make logoMake4.4

Visual automation platform with AI Agents on every plan, billed per credit, for business users who want more power per dollar than Zapier.

From $16 per month billed monthly (per credit)

Visit Make

Side by side

Specn8nMake
BestBots Score4.34.4
Starting price€24 per month billed monthly (about $27)$16 per month billed monthly
Pricing modelper workflow executionper credit
Free trial14 day free cloud trial with Pro features, 1,000 executions, no credit cardNone listed
Free tierSelf hosted Community Edition free; 14 day cloud trial with 1,000 executions1,000 credits per month
Paid from€24 per month billed monthly, €20 billed annually (about $27 and $22.51) for 2,500 executions$16 per month billed monthly, $12 billed annually (10,000 credits)
ModelsAny model, cloud or local; AI models without API keys on cloud plansMake AI Provider or your own model connection
Integrations count500+ built in integrations plus any HTTP API3,500+ apps
Code optionJavaScript and PythonCustom functions on Enterprise; Make API from Core
Self hostYes, Docker, on premises or air gappedNo, cloud only

The short answer

n8n and Make are the two platforms people usually compare once Zapier gets too expensive. Both have visual canvases, both build AI agents, and both cost a fraction of Zapier at volume. They split on audience.

Make was built for operations and marketing teams. Modules for 3,500+ apps, routers, filters and a Reasoning panel for agents all sit on a canvas you can learn without writing code. It runs only in Make's cloud.

n8n was built for people who are comfortable with data. You see the JSON flowing between nodes, you can drop in JavaScript or Python anywhere, you can choose any model including local ones, and you can run the whole thing on your own servers.

Pricing

Line item n8n Make
Billing unit Workflow execution, unlimited steps Credit, most actions 1 credit
Free option Community Edition, self hosted; cloud trial with 1,000 executions Free plan, 1,000 credits a month
Entry plan, billed monthly Starter about $27 (€24) for 2,500 executions Core $16 for 10,000 credits
Entry plan, billed annually about $23 (€20) a month $12 a month
Mid tier, billed monthly Pro $60 for 10,000 executions Pro $28 for 10,000 credits
Team tier, billed monthly Business about $900 (€800), or about $751 (€667) annually, 40,000 executions, self hosted Teams $51 for 10,000 credits
Extra usage Upgrade tier $1.60 per 1,000 credits on Core
Users Unlimited on every plan Teams and roles on Teams plan
Annual discount 17% 25%

The right answer depends on steps per run. Make charges per action; n8n charges per run.

  • A 3 step workflow run 2,000 times a month. About 6,000 Make credits, so Core at $16. On n8n it is 2,000 executions, so Starter at about $27 (€24). Make wins.
  • A 5 step workflow run 2,000 times a month. About 10,000 Make credits, still Core at $16. n8n is still about $27 (€24). Make wins narrowly.
  • A 10 step workflow run 5,000 times a month. About 50,000 Make credits, which is Core plus roughly 40,000 extra credits at $1.60 per 1,000, or about $80 (a higher credit tier may cost less). On n8n it is 5,000 executions, which needs Pro at $60. n8n wins, and the gap grows with every added step.

Those Make figures assume 1 credit per action; AI Provider steps can use more. Self hosting n8n changes the math entirely, since the Community Edition has no subscription and you pay only for hosting and maintenance.

Features

Feature n8n Make
Integrations 500+ built in, plus HTTP request for any API 3,500+ apps
Builder Node canvas with visible data Visual canvas with routers, filters, iterators
AI agents Multi agent, RAG, MCP, human approval, evaluations AI Agents on all plans, Reasoning panel
AI models Any model, cloud or local Make AI Provider or your own connection
Code JavaScript and Python Custom functions on Enterprise
Self hosting Yes: Docker, on premises, air gapped No
Debugging Inspect each execution, re run single steps Execution logs, full text search on Pro
Security SSO, SAML, LDAP, RBAC, audit logs on higher plans SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 27001, GDPR
Public reviews Trustpilot 3.0 from 50 reviews Trustpilot 2.7 from 172 reviews

AI agents. n8n is the stronger platform if you want to engineer agents: choose models per step, run local models, build multi agent systems with RAG and test outputs with built in evaluations. Make is the stronger platform if you want agents that business users can build and audit, since the Reasoning panel shows each decision and agents run inside ordinary scenarios.

Integrations. Make's catalog is about seven times n8n's built in list. n8n closes the gap with its HTTP request node, but that means reading API docs and handling authentication yourself.

Ownership. n8n is open source with 207,000+ GitHub stars, and the self hosted edition gives you full source access. Make is a managed service with SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001, so compliance paperwork is easier, but you cannot move it in house.

Who wins for each scenario

A marketing team automating lead routing and reporting. Make. More ready made modules, an easier canvas, and Core at $16 covers typical volumes.

A developer building AI agents that call internal APIs. n8n. Code steps, model choice and self hosting make it the natural fit.

A company with strict data residency rules. n8n, self hosted or air gapped. Make is cloud only.

A small business owner on a tight budget with no technical help. Make Free or Core. The free plan includes AI Agents, and support comes with paid plans.

Verdict

Pick Make if your builders are business users, your workflows are short to medium length, and you want the most apps and the gentlest learning curve for the money.

Pick n8n if you have technical skills on the team, your workflows run many steps at high volume, or you need to self host. It is the more powerful agent platform and gets cheaper the more you use it.

See where both rank in our best AI agent builders guide, compare each with Zapier in n8n vs Zapier and Make vs Zapier, or read the full n8n review and Make review.

Frequently asked questions

Is n8n better than Make?

For developers and high volume, long workflows, yes: n8n counts a whole run as one execution and can be self hosted. For business users who want a visual builder with more ready made apps and support on paid plans, Make is the better choice.

Which is cheaper, n8n or Make?

It depends on how many steps your workflows have. Make Core is $16 a month for 10,000 credits, where most actions use 1 credit. n8n Starter is about $27 (€24) for 2,500 executions with unlimited steps. Short workflows favor Make; long workflows with 5 or more steps per run tip toward n8n as volume grows, and self hosted n8n has no subscription at all.

Which is easier, n8n or Make?

Make. Its canvas was designed for business users and it ships 3,500+ ready made app modules. n8n shows you more of the underlying data and expects some comfort with JSON and APIs.

Which is better for AI agents, n8n or Make?

n8n offers deeper control: multi agent systems, RAG, MCP, local models and built in evaluations. Make offers a simpler start: AI Agents on every plan, built on the same canvas as scenarios, with a Reasoning panel that shows each decision.

Can Make be self hosted?

No. Make is cloud only. If you need to keep workflows and data on your own servers, n8n's Community Edition or Business plan is the option between these two.

Does Make have a free plan?

Yes. Make Free includes 1,000 credits a month, the visual builder, 3,500+ apps and AI Agents, with a 15 minute minimum interval between runs. n8n has no free cloud plan, only a trial, but its self hosted edition is free.

Should I switch from Make to n8n?

Switch if your bill is driven by long, high volume scenarios or you need self hosting or custom code. Stay on Make if your team is non technical or relies on apps that n8n does not have a built in node for.

Sources

  1. 1.n8n pricing
  2. 2.n8n homepage
  3. 3.n8n vs Zapier (n8n)
  4. 4.n8n on Trustpilot
  5. 5.n8n Start-up Plan
  6. 6.n8n Gateway credits docs
  7. 7.n8n free trial docs
  8. 8.ECB euro reference rates
  9. 9.Make pricing
  10. 10.Make AI Agents
  11. 11.Make vs n8n (Make)
  12. 12.Make on Trustpilot