Make Review 2026: Pricing, Features and Verdict
Make's visual automation platform and AI Agents judged on published pricing, the new credit system, integrations and fit, as of October 2026.
By , research by the BestBots team · Updated Oct 18, 2026
Fact checked against each company's published pricing, documentation and verified user ratings. How we score
Make is the best value AI agent builder for small businesses and ops teams: $16 a month billed monthly buys 10,000 credits, AI Agents are included on every plan including Free, and the visual canvas handles complex, branching workflows. The tradeoffs are a steeper learning curve than Zapier, a smaller app catalog (3,500+ against 9,000+) and no self hosting.

Make gives the most automation per dollar for non developers: $16 a month buys 10,000 credits and AI Agents are on every plan, including Free. The tradeoff is a canvas that takes longer to learn than Zapier and AI actions that can burn more than 1 credit each.
No user reviews yet. Write a review
- Starting price
- $16 per month billed monthly
- Pricing model
- per credit
- Free plan
- Yes
- Free trial
- None listed
- Free tier
- 1,000 credits per month
- Paid from
- $16 per month billed monthly, $12 billed annually (10,000 credits)
- Models
- Make AI Provider or your own model connection
- Integrations count
- 3,500+ apps
- Code option
- Custom functions on Enterprise; Make API from Core
- Self host
- No, cloud only
What it is
Make, formerly Integromat, is a cloud automation platform built around a visual canvas. A scenario starts with a trigger module and flows through actions, routers that split the path, filters, iterators and error handlers, all laid out like a diagram. Make says 500,000+ companies have used the platform.
Make AI Agents bring agentic behavior onto the same canvas. An agent gets instructions and tools, reasons about unstructured input such as a free text email, chooses what to do next and triggers real scenarios. Every decision appears step by step in a Reasoning panel, which makes agents easier to audit than black box assistants. Make positions agents for workflows that need judgment and keeps fixed scenarios for everything rule based.
Pricing explained
Make moved to credits as its billing unit on August 27. Plans are priced by how many credits you need a month; the table below shows the lowest tier, 10,000 credits.
| Plan | Price billed monthly | Price billed annually | Extra credits | Key additions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | $0 | Not listed | 1,000 credits a month, 3,500+ apps, routers and filters, 15 minute minimum interval |
| Core | $16 | $12 | $1.60 per 1,000 | Unlimited active scenarios, scheduling down to the minute, Make API |
| Pro | $28 | $21 | $2.80 per 1,000 | Priority execution, custom variables, full text log search |
| Teams | $51 | $38 | $5.10 per 1,000 | Teams and roles, shared scenario templates |
| Enterprise | Quote only | Quote only | Custom | Custom functions, enterprise apps, 24/7 support, overage protection |
Most actions use 1 credit. Advanced features that use Make's AI Provider can use more, so an agent heavy scenario will burn credits faster than a simple data sync. Extra credits come in bundles of 1,000 or 10,000.
To put that in context, a 5 step workflow (a trigger plus 4 actions) that runs 2,000 times a month uses roughly 8,000 to 10,000 credits and fits Core at $16. The same workload costs about $27 (€24) on n8n Starter and $193.50 on Zapier's 10,000 task tier, all billed monthly. Make is the cheapest of the three for short and medium length workflows; n8n overtakes it when workflows run many steps at high volume because n8n charges once per run.
Annual billing saves 25%. Companies with fewer than 20 employees can check eligibility for the Start up Plan, which takes 50% off. For per unit rates across every category we track, see the AI Price Index.
Features
- Visual scenario builder. Routers, filters, iterators and error handlers on one canvas.
- AI Agents on all plans. Built and debugged on the canvas, with a Reasoning panel for every decision.
- 3,500+ apps plus an HTTP module for any API.
- Make API from Core, for managing scenarios programmatically.
- Scheduling down to the minute on paid plans; Free waits at least 15 minutes between runs.
- Make Grid, a workflow orchestration view across your scenarios.
- Collaboration. Teams, roles and shareable scenario templates on the Teams plan.
- Security. SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 27001 and GDPR, with AES 256 encryption at rest and TLS in transit.
Where it falls short: no self hosting, custom code functions only on Enterprise, and a catalog well behind Zapier's for niche apps.
Setup
You can sign up for Free and start from a template or a blank canvas. Connecting apps is a sign in flow, and modules expose their fields in menus. The learning curve is in the logic: understanding bundles, mapping fields between modules and using routers well. Expect a few hours before a multi branch scenario feels natural, and use the execution log to see exactly what each module received and returned.
Agents follow the same pattern. Add an agent to a scenario, give it instructions and the tools it may call, then run it and read the Reasoning panel to check its choices before you switch the scenario on.
Who it is for
- Small businesses that want serious automation at a low monthly cost.
- Operations, marketing and RevOps teams building workflows with branches and loops.
- Agencies that build automations for clients and need volume without per task pricing.
- Teams adding AI agents to existing processes who want to see why the agent acted.
Who should skip it
- Absolute beginners who want results in an hour. Zapier's linear editor is gentler. See Make vs Zapier.
- Teams that need self hosting or custom code below Enterprise. n8n covers both. See n8n vs Make.
- Businesses that live in niche SaaS tools. Check Make's app list first.
- Anyone uneasy about subscription billing disputes. Make's Trustpilot score is 2.7 from 172 reviews, polarized between 5 star and 1 star, though Make replies to 90% of negative reviews.
How it compares
| Make | Zapier | n8n | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry paid plan, billed monthly | $16 for 10,000 credits | $29.99 for 750 tasks | about $27 (€24) for 2,500 executions |
| Billing unit | Credit per action | Task per action | Full run |
| Integrations | 3,500+ | 9,000+ | 500+ built in |
| AI agents | All plans | Separate add on | All plans |
| Self hosting | No | No | Yes |
Read the full Zapier review and n8n review, or see all nine platforms ranked in the best AI agent builders guide.
Verdict
Make gives more automation per dollar than any other no code platform we compare, and including AI Agents on every plan makes it the easiest way for a small business to try agents without a second bill. It earns the third slot in our ranking, behind Zapier on ease and n8n on raw power, and first on value.
Choose it if you are willing to spend an afternoon learning the canvas. If you are not, Zapier is the friendlier start; if you outgrow Make's catalog or need to self host, n8n is the next step.
How Make scores
- Value
- 4.6
- Features
- 4.4
- Ease of setup
- 4.1
- Integrations
- 4.6
- Trust
- 4.1
Pros and cons
Pros
- AI Agents available on all plans, including Free
- 10,000 credits for $16 a month, far more volume per dollar than Zapier
- Reasoning panel shows each agent decision step by step
- SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 listed
Cons
- Visual canvas takes longer to learn than Zapier
- AI Provider actions can use more than 1 credit per step
- No self hosting
- Trustpilot 2.7 from 172 reviews
Make plans and pricing
| Plan | Price | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 1,000 credits per month, 3,500+ apps, 15 minute minimum interval |
| Core | $16 per month billed monthly ($12 billed annually) | 10,000 credits, unlimited active scenarios, scheduling down to the minute, Make API |
| Pro | $28 per month billed monthly ($21 billed annually) | 10,000 credits, priority execution, custom variables, full text log search |
| Teams | $51 per month billed monthly ($38 billed annually) | 10,000 credits, teams and roles, shared templates |
| Enterprise | Quote only | Custom functions, enterprise apps, 24/7 support, overage protection |
What users say
Make reviews from users
No user reviews yet
Be the first to review MakeMake alternatives
Zapier4.4
n8n4.3
Vapi4.3
AI Engine4.2
ElevenLabs Agents4.2
Microsoft Copilot Studio4.2Frequently asked questions
Is Make worth it in 2026?
Yes for most small businesses and ops teams. $16 a month billed monthly buys 10,000 credits, AI Agents are included on every plan, and the canvas handles branching logic well. It is less worth it if your team wants the simplest editor possible or needs self hosting.
How much does Make cost?
At the 10,000 credit tier, Core is $16 a month billed monthly or $12 billed annually, Pro is $28 or $21, and Teams is $51 or $38. Free includes 1,000 credits a month. Enterprise is quote only. Companies under 20 employees can apply for the Start up Plan at 50% off.
What is a Make credit?
Credits replaced operations as Make's billing unit on August 27. Each action a scenario performs uses credits; most use 1, while some advanced features that run on Make's AI Provider use more. Extra credits are sold in bundles of 1,000 or 10,000.
Does Make have AI agents?
Yes. Make AI Agents are available on all plans, including Free. You build, run and debug them on the same canvas as your scenarios, and the Reasoning panel shows each decision step by step.
Is Make easier than Zapier?
No. Zapier is easier for a first automation. Make's visual canvas is more powerful, with routers, filters and iterators on one screen, but most people need a few hours to get comfortable.
Can I self host Make?
No, Make is cloud only. If self hosting is a requirement, look at n8n.
Is Make the same as Integromat?
Yes. Integromat rebranded as Make. The scenario builder carried over and has since gained AI Agents and credit based billing.