Cursor Review 2026: Pricing, Features and Verdict
The AI code editor, reviewed on its October 2026 plans after the move into The X Subscription, its included models, agents, privacy and who should skip it.
By , research by the BestBots team ยท Updated Oct 19, 2026
Fact checked against each company's published pricing, documentation and verified user ratings. How we score
Cursor is still one of the most complete AI code editors, with an agent, a CLI, Cloud Agents, Automations and Bugbot code review under one plan. But since it moved into The X Subscription, the included usage covers Cursor's own Grok and Composer models only. Claude, GPT and Gemini cost extra at API list price, so for most developers it is now a weaker value than GitHub Copilot or a $20 vendor plan.

Cursor is still a full AI native editor with agents, Cloud Agents, Bugbot reviews and a CLI, but new plans changed sharply: the included pool covers Cursor's own Grok and Composer models only, and Claude, GPT and Gemini are billed on top at API list price from Premium ($30 per month) up. That makes it a weaker value than it was for anyone who mainly wants third party frontier models, and its Trustpilot score is 1.5 from 348 reviews.
No user reviews yet. Write a review
- Starting price
- $8 per month
- Pricing model
- per seat subscription plus usage
- Free plan
- Yes
- Free trial
- None listed
- Price
- $30 per month (Premium); Plus $8 is Grok only
- Models
- Grok 4.7, 4.6, 4.5 and Composer 2.5 included; Claude, GPT, Gemini at API list price on Premium and up
- IDE support
- Cursor editor (desktop), Cloud Agents, mobile
- Terminal agent
- Yes, Cursor CLI
- Usage limits
- Weekly usage pool: Premium 4x Plus, Super 15x, Ultra 50x
- Team plan
- Teams $30, $100 or $200 per seat per month
What it is
Cursor is a desktop code editor built around AI. It looks and feels like VS Code, and on top of the editor it adds:
- Agent in the editor, which plans and edits across files and runs commands.
- Cursor CLI for the same agent in a terminal.
- Cloud Agents and Automations, which run tasks in the cloud and on triggers while your laptop is closed.
- Bugbot, an AI code reviewer for pull requests.
- Origin, Cursor's code hosting.
- Mobile access to agents.
The big change in 2026 is commercial, not technical. Cursor's docs now say it "is sold as part of The X Subscription", one subscription for Grok, Cursor and X, and the pricing page says subscriptions are sold only through X Subscription Corp. Your weekly usage pool is shared across Cursor, Grok Chat, Imagine, Voice and Grok Bot, and paid tiers come with X perks such as a Premium checkmark, ad reduction and X Money cashback. For a developer this mostly matters in one way: the models that are included in the flat fee are Cursor's own.
Pricing explained
| Plan | Monthly | Annual | Included usage | Third party models |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | Not applicable | Limited agent and chat | No |
| Plus | $8 | $80 a year | Base pool, Grok and Composer only | No |
| Premium | $30 | $300 a year | 4x Plus | API list price |
| Super | $100 | $1,000 a year | 15x Plus | API list price |
| Ultra | $200 | $2,000 a year | 50x Plus | API list price |
| Teams | $30, $100 or $200 per seat | Not listed | Matches seat tier | API list price plus $0.25 per million tokens |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom | Pooled | API list price plus $0.25 per million tokens |
Prices as listed on Cursor's pricing page and docs in October 2026, before tax.
What each tier limits. Plus runs Grok 4.7, Grok 4.6, Grok 4.5 and Composer 2.5 at fixed settings: Fast mode off, medium effort, and a 256k context window on Grok 4.7. It has no Auto mode, Cloud Agents, Automations, Bugbot, Origin, third party models or bring your own key. Premium removes those limits and adds Grok Bot and video generation. Super adds priority model access at peak times, and Ultra adds the earliest access to new products and models.
The weekly pool. Every paid plan includes one pool of usage for Cursor models, refreshed weekly. Different models draw at different rates, and when the pool runs out you can wait for the reset, buy prepaid credit or upgrade. Cursor says requests are never downgraded in quality or speed when you hit the limit.
Rates beyond the pool. Extra Cursor model usage is billed per million tokens: Grok 4.7 at $2 input and $6 output, Composer 2.5 at $0.50 and $2.50.
Third party models. Claude, GPT and Gemini are not in the pool on any plan. On Premium and up they bill at API list price from the first request. Listed rates include Claude Sonnet 5.5 at $2 input and $10 output per million tokens, Claude Opus 5.5 at $4 and $20, GPT 5.6 Sol at $4 and $20, Gemini 3.1 Pro at $2 and $12, and Claude Haiku 5.5 at $0.10 and $0.50. Regional data residency adds 10%.
Teams surcharge. On Teams and Enterprise, every third party request also carries the Cursor Token Rate of $0.25 per million tokens, including bring your own key traffic. Individual plans do not pay it.
Worked example. A developer on Premium who sends 20 million input and 2 million output tokens a month to Claude Sonnet 5.5 pays $30 plus $40 plus $20, so $90 a month. The same usage on a Teams seat adds 22 times $0.25, about $5.50 more. See our full Cursor pricing breakdown and the Price Index.
Legacy plans. Pro, Pro+, Ultra, Hobby, Start and Teams Standard and Premium seats keep working for existing customers, with two monthly pools and on demand usage.
Key features
Agent and Cursor Router
The agent plans changes, edits across files and runs commands from the editor or the CLI. Auto mode on individual plans is Cost mode, which bills as a Cursor model request. On Teams and Enterprise, Cursor Router can route Balance and Intelligence requests to either a Cursor model or a third party model, and a third party route is billed as third party usage.
Cloud Agents and Automations
From Premium up, agents can run in the cloud and on schedules or triggers, so a task can keep going after you close the laptop. This is the main thing the $8 Plus plan leaves out.
Bugbot code review
Bugbot reviews pull requests and flags bugs. It is included from Premium, which saves buying a separate review tool.
Origin code hosting
Cursor now offers its own code hosting, included from Premium. Most teams will keep GitHub or GitLab, but it is there.
Model menu
Included: Grok 4.7, 4.6, 4.5 and Composer 2.5. Pay as you go: Claude Fable 5.1, Opus 5.5, Sonnet 5.5 and Haiku 5.5, Gemini 4 Argon, 3.1 Pro and 3.8 Flash, and GPT 5.6 Sol, Terra and Luna, among others.
Team controls
Teams adds centralized billing, usage analytics, a team marketplace for rules, skills and plugins, team wide privacy mode, custom chat data retention and SAML or OIDC SSO. Enterprise adds SCIM, invoicing, pooled usage, granular spend limits, repository, model and MCP access controls, and audit logs.
What users say
Cursor's Trustpilot profile shows 1.5 out of 5 from 348 reviews. The recurring complaints:
- Billing. Unexpected charges, unrequested plan upgrades and unclear renewals.
- Support. A bot first, slow human replies, and refund requests turned down.
- Account blocks without a clear explanation.
- Pricing changes mid subscription and usage that runs out faster than expected.
The praise, where it appears, is about the editor itself being productive for everyday coding. Trustpilot skews toward people with a problem, so treat it as a signal about billing and support rather than code quality.
Privacy and security
Cursor's pricing FAQ says that with Privacy Mode on, code data is not used for training by Cursor or its model providers. You can turn it on yourself, and a team admin can enforce it. Teams plans add custom chat data retention, and Enterprise adds audit logs, service accounts, network and browser controls for agents, and access controls for repositories, models and MCP servers. Models are hosted by the provider, a partner or Cursor, per its sub processor list. If you opt into regional data residency, model prices rise 10%.
One more point to weigh: your Cursor subscription now sits inside an account that also covers X and Grok. Buyers with strict vendor policies should check that with procurement.
Who it is for
- Developers who want an all in one AI editor with agents, cloud runs and code review in one app.
- People happy with Grok and Composer models, who get the most out of the flat fee.
- Heavy agent users who can justify Super or Ultra and want priority access.
- Teams that want Bugbot and Cloud Agents without buying separate tools.
Who should skip it
- Anyone who mainly wants Claude, GPT or Gemini. You pay API list price on top of the plan. GitHub Copilot at $10, Claude Code at $20 or Codex at $20 include those models in plan usage.
- Budget buyers on Plus. At $8 it has no third party models, no Cloud Agents and no Bugbot.
- Companies that cannot accept an X bundled vendor or that need predictable invoices.
- JetBrains or Xcode users who want to keep their IDE; Cursor is its own editor.
Alternatives
- GitHub Copilot: $10 a month, frontier models from four labs in its credits, works in your current IDE.
- Windsurf, now Devin Desktop: the closest editor, $20 Pro with frontier model quota.
- Claude Code and Codex: $20 terminal agents bundled with chat plans.
- Cline: free and open source, pay only for tokens.
- Kiro: spec driven agent IDE with a published credit count per plan.
See all of them ranked in Cursor alternatives, and head to heads in Cursor vs Windsurf and Cursor vs Codex.
Verdict
Cursor the product is still strong: agent, CLI, Cloud Agents, Automations, Bugbot and Origin under one roof, with a weekly pool so one heavy day does not burn the month. Cursor the purchase is harder to recommend. The flat fee now buys Grok and Composer, everything else is metered at API list price, the bill arrives through X Subscription Corp, and its Trustpilot score is 1.5 from 348 reviews. If you like Cursor's own models, Premium at $30 is a fair deal. If you came to Cursor for Claude or GPT, a $10 to $20 plan elsewhere gets you more for less.
How Cursor scores
- Value
- 3.6
- Features
- 4.5
- Ease of setup
- 4.3
- Integrations
- 4.0
- Trust
- 3.3
Pros and cons
Pros
- Full editor, CLI, Cloud Agents and Automations under one plan
- Bugbot code review and Origin code hosting included from Premium
- Weekly usage refresh, so one heavy day does not burn the month
- Very wide third party model menu at API list price, including Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT 5.6
Cons
- Included usage covers Cursor's own models only; Claude, GPT and Gemini are billed extra from prepaid credit
- The $8 Plus plan has no third party models, Cloud Agents or Bugbot
- Pricing is bundled with Grok and X features most developers do not need
- Trustpilot 1.5 from 348 reviews, with billing and support complaints
Cursor plans and pricing
| Plan | Price | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | Limited agent and chat requests |
| Plus | $8 per month | Agent with Grok 4.7, 4.6, 4.5 and Composer 2.5 at fixed settings; no third party models, Cloud Agents or Bugbot |
| Premium | $30 per month | 4x Plus usage, Cloud Agents and Automations, Bugbot code review, Origin code hosting, third party models at API list price |
| Super | $100 per month | 15x Plus usage, priority model access at peak times |
| Ultra | $200 per month | 50x Plus usage, earliest access to new models |
| Teams | $30, $100 or $200 per seat per month | Pooled usage, SSO, usage analytics, team marketplace |
| Enterprise | Custom | SCIM, audit logs, granular spend and model controls |
What users say
Cursor reviews from users
No user reviews yet
Be the first to review CursorCursor alternatives
ChatGPT4.6
GitHub Copilot4.6
Claude4.5
Claude Code4.4
OpenAI Codex4.3
Kiro4.1Frequently asked questions
Is Cursor worth it in 2026?
It depends on which models you want. If you are happy with Cursor's own Grok and Composer models, Premium at $30 a month buys a full AI editor with Cloud Agents, Automations and Bugbot code review. If you mainly want Claude, GPT or Gemini, you pay for them on top at API list price, which makes $10 GitHub Copilot or a $20 vendor plan cheaper for most people.
How much does Cursor cost?
Free is $0 with limited agent and chat use. Plus is $8 a month, Premium $30, Super $100 and Ultra $200. Annual billing is $80, $300, $1,000 and $2,000 a year. Teams seats are $30, $100 or $200 per user a month, and Enterprise is custom. Third party model usage is extra on every paid plan.
What is The X Subscription?
It is one subscription that covers Grok, Cursor and X. Cursor's pricing page says subscriptions are sold only through X Subscription Corp, and the same weekly usage pool is shared across Cursor, Grok Chat, Imagine, Voice and Grok Bot. Paid tiers also include X features such as a Premium checkmark and X Money cashback.
Can I still use Claude or GPT in Cursor?
Yes, on Premium and above. Third party models such as Claude Opus 5.5, Claude Sonnet 5.5, GPT 5.6 Sol and Gemini 3.1 Pro are billed at the model's API list price from the first request, paid from prepaid credit. Plus and Free cannot use third party models or your own API keys.
What happened to Cursor Pro at $20?
Pro, Pro+, Ultra, Hobby, Start and the old Teams seats are now legacy plans. Cursor's docs say they keep working for existing customers with two monthly usage pools and on demand usage. New buyers choose from Plus, Premium, Super and Ultra.
Does Cursor train on my code?
Cursor's pricing FAQ says that when Privacy Mode is on, code data is not used for training by Cursor or its model providers. Privacy Mode can be turned on in settings or enforced by a team admin. Teams plans add team wide privacy settings and custom chat data retention.
Is Cursor better than GitHub Copilot?
Cursor is a full editor with Cloud Agents and Bugbot built in. Copilot is an extension and CLI that works in VS Code, Visual Studio, JetBrains, Xcode and Eclipse for $10 a month, with Claude, GPT, Gemini and Grok models inside its credits. For most developers Copilot is the better value; see our Cursor vs GitHub Copilot comparison.
Why is Cursor rated so low on Trustpilot?
Its Trustpilot profile shows 1.5 from 348 reviews. The recurring complaints are unexpected charges and plan upgrades, slow support that starts with a bot, account blocks and frustration with pricing changes. A small number of reviewers still praise the editor itself.